|
|
Posts Tagged ‘Amanda Seyfried’
Monday, February 8th, 2010
Nicholas Sparks’ novels adapted for the screen make for good romantic fare with no shortage of tear-jerking situations, the jerkiest of which being 2004’s THE NOTEBOOK. His latest, directed by Lasse Hallstrom, is DEAR JOHN with Channing Tatum and Amanda Seyfried playing the young lovers attempting to overcome the obstacles of the plot. Obstacles in relationships span from situation’s as diverse as the Bard’s “Romeo and Juliet” to Billy Joe Royal’s 1965 song “Down in the Boondocks,” but one thing DEAR JOHN does well that has typically been the death nail for other films is incorporate a post-9/11 military aspect to the story. This is overcome due to our investment in the early stages of the relationship of Seyfried and Tatum. They are likable leads and well acted characters, but years pass in the movie with no explanation and its easy to get lost in the ambiguous timeline. By the time they meet again later in the film, we are confused and less interested due to that confusion. Also, the premise of the film in the title – writing letters – is an antiquated concept in the age of e-mail and IM and what not, even in times of war. Finally, the ending is quickly thrown together and lacks the emotional punch we’d expect from this consummate tear-jerker.

Channing Tatum plays John Tyree, an Army Special Forces sergeant on leave back home in Charleston, surfing to show off his Army body. He meets Seyfried’s Savannah Curtis as she is on a break from college and in their 2 weeks together they develop a sweet relationship that feels real. The story hints at John’s past as a troublemaker but it only manifests in one altercation at a beach party after a fight with Savannah and we never see it again. There are sweet elements involving Savannah’s friends Tim (Henry Thomas) and his autistic son, and a great performance by Richard Jenkins as John’s father. However, as they part and begin their pen pal relationship we become less interested as we simply get a series of montages and voiceovers. The conflict occurs within John after 9/11 when he is torn between getting out of the service to be with Savannah or re-enlisting to fight the war and support his Army unit. Later, there is a nice element of surprise when we find out Savannah has pursued another relationship and in finding out with whom, but then there’s a quickly thrown together story of an illness and a death which takes us away from the romance only to throw it back together again hastily. The ending got to some of the women in the theater, but not all of them, and dry eyes at the end of a Sparks’ movie is not a good sign.

Tatum does well here as the gentle warrior who wins the girl with more than just his physique. He has emotional scenes dealing with his possible re-enlistment after September 11th and a medical condition of his father’s, and it doesn’t feel forced or contrived. When he gets his real “Dear John” letter about Savannah being engaged to someone else, he doesn’t oversell his pain, but makes the smart decision to play it down. As Savannah, Amanda Seyfried is adorable and charming, especially in the sweetness displayed toward Tim’s autistic child and John’s father. I’ve always liked Seyfried and appreciate the diversity of her larger roles as of late (MAMMA MIA!, JENNIFER’S BODY, to this). Richard Jenkins plays the role of John’s father incredibly well, with reserve for most of the film but with a heartbreaking scene of panic befitting an actor of his caliber. Other supporting players play their parts well, but their side stories lead to drastic changes in the plot, but aren’t fully fleshed out.

The problem is not the performances, but rather the second half of the film, so that even when John and Savannah meet up again towards the end, we don’t care as much as we should. As I walked out, I heard some women saying the ending was changed from the ending in the book. Not having read it, I cannot say, but maybe sticking with the original ending would have been a better route to take.
Tags: Amanda Seyfried, Channing Tatum, Lasse Hallstrom, richard jenkins Posted in Reviews |
Sunday, February 7th, 2010
Posted by: Brad Sturdivant
AVATAR officially passed TITANIC on Tuesday and most analysts predicted it would easily make it eight weekends in a row, but what they couldn’t predict is the appeal of a shirtless Channing Tatum. That, and people love their Nicholas Sparks novels/movies. DEAR JOHN (watch the trailer here) took the top spot at the box office with over $32 million, which was good enough to beat AVATAR’s $23 million. I think when you take into consideration the release date and the continued draw of AVATAR, you have to be pretty impressed by DEAR JOHN’s numbers. But so far, AVATAR has managed over $630 million, putting it $30 million past TITANIC and counting. The other movie opening this weekend was FROM PARIS WITH LOVE, starring a goatee-touting John Travolta. It didn’t fare as well and only managed $8 million. I was halfway expecting THE BLIND SIDE to jump back into the top ten after getting an Oscar nomination, but maybe its time has passed.
Next week sees the release of THE WOLFMAN and VALENTINE’S DAY and I’m guessing your view on love will dictate which movie you go see. It would almost be a travesty if a movie called “Valentine’s Day” couldn’t capture the box office on Valentine’s Day weekend. Of course, if you’ve seen the VALENTINE’S DAY trailer, maybe that won’t be such a surprise.

1 Dear John $32,400,000
2 Avatar $23,600,000
3 From Paris with Love $8,120,000
4 Edge of Darkness $7,005,000
5 Tooth Fairy $6,500,000
6 When in Rome $5,504,000
7 The Book of Eli $4,835,000
8 Crazy Heart $3,650,000
9 Legion (2010) $3,400,000
10 Sherlock Holmes $2,630,000
Source: Box Office Mojo
Tags: Amanda Seyfried, Channing Tatum, james cameron Posted in News |
Saturday, November 21st, 2009
Posted by: Brad Sturdivant
The trailer for Amanda Seyfried’s LETTERS TO JULIET is here and it looks like Seyfried is determined to star in the sappiest movies she can find. We just recently posted the trailer for DEAR JOHN, so maybe she has a fascination with writing letters as well. In Juliet, Seyfried plays a girl that finds an old letter in a wall and decides to respond to the author, who turns out to be Vanessa Redgrave, still searching for her true love. Gael Garcia Bernal will play the token boyfriend that’s clearly not good enough for our heroine. The film is directed by Gary Winick, who also directed the travesty that was BRIDE WARS.
I was okay with this trailer until they started playing Taylor Swift’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’ and then it lost me.
Watch the trailer here.

Tags: Amanda Seyfried, Gael Garcia Bernal, Gary Winick, Vanessa Redgrave Posted in News |
Monday, September 28th, 2009
I loved JUNO when it came out in late ‘07/early ’08. I thought Ellen Page was great, Jason Bateman was funny, and Michael Cera did his awkward/quiet thing to perfection. The writer, Diablo Cody (real name Brook Busey), kind of went into a media blitz where we couldn’t hear anything else but how she was a stripper and she bounced from writing a blog and a memoir to this hip script on teenage pregnancy. But it was still a great script and we got to see said exotic dancer at the podium with a statuette and her huge, garish tattoo come Oscar time, which led to Steven Spielberg signing her on to write for his series “The United States of Tara” which got Toni Collette a statue of her own recently. So yeah, she’s got some game.

But when I heard her next film would be a zombie-demon-teen horror flick, I was skeptical, even with the smoking hot Megan Fox signed on to star. And even in sitting through the film, I kept bouncing back and forth as to whether or not I liked it. Teen horror flicks tend to lean towards the cheesy, and for those parts of the film, the followed that formulaic pattern. But Cody put in touches of her hip-funny dialogue at other parts which took the movie to a level above the typical, banal horror banter. However, apparently her dialogue exists on a bell curve, where you can only put up with it to a point, and then you just think she’s trying too hard for the obvious laugh. For example, an early riff on backdoor virginity gets laughs, but her line later (from the previews) about “going both ways” gets a groan.

The storyline is an original twist on the typical horror flick. A band fronted by an eyeliner-wearing Adam Brody comes to the little town of Devil’s Kettle and seduces local hottie Jennifer Check (Megan Fox) into their suspicious van. Jennifer’s friend, Needy Lesnicki (Amanda Seyfreid, looking good as well, though playing second fiddle to Fox), notices a change to Jennifer after this van trip, and also notices an increase in gruesome murders among the local boys. In true best friend fashion, Jennifer explains the circumstances of her demonic transformation to Needy, its link to the dead boys, and Needy must make that often difficult decision most young girls have to make with their best friends: stay friends, or kill her. Needy’s boyfriend, Chip (Johnny Simmons), ends up being an object of contention between the two girls, making the decision a little easier for Lesnicki, leading to the climactic GIRLFIGHT…which incidentally was the title of this director’s (Karyn Kusama) first movie.

Speaking of the director, Karyn Kusama’s association with the show “The L Word” may have caused her to add a completely random, yet incredibly hot, kissing scene between Fox and Seyfreid. It has nothing to do with the plot, does nothing to further the story, and is not dealt with afterward. But again…pretty hot.

But that kissing scene, some of the early lines, all of Adam Brody’s parts, and some great lines from J.K. Simmons as a teacher, give the movie what little credit it should receive. But when all is said and done, it’s still a teen horror flick, with just a few interesting parts… and most of those parts belong to Megan Fox (Get it? I’m referring to body parts. It works better in a Groucho Marx accent).
Tags: Adam Brody, Amanda Seyfried, Karyn Kusama, Megan Fox Posted in Reviews |
Friday, September 18th, 2009
Sigh. Society has dictated that liking certain things makes a man less of a man. For example; liking the color pink, throw pillows or fruity drinks will usually get your man card revoked. I’m not sure when certain things became less manly, but men feel pressure to either not like those things, or to hide their fondness. Another example would be the Swedish 70’s band, Abba and indirectly, the musical MAMMA MIA!.
But you’ll occasionally catch me at the bar sipping on a Rum Runner or picking out new throw pillows at Macy’s. I’ve never been one to change my likes or dislikes because I want to fit a particular image. So with that in mind, I will make my declaration to the world that I love Abba. Not only Abba, but the musical and movie MAMMA MIA! It’s fun, it’s cute, it’s sweet and the musical numbers make you want to get up and dance. If admitting that makes me less of a man, well, I guess I’m okay with that.
Sophie Sheridan (Amanda Seyfried) is about to get married and dreams of having her father walk her down the aisle. Unfortunately for her, her mom was a bit of a slut wild when she was younger and she doesn’t really know who the father is. So Sophie has narrowed it down to three contestants and much to the surprise of her mother, she invites all three of them to her wedding. Of course, this comes as a shock and the rest of the film is dedicated to trying to figure out who her father is.
The entire movie is set to Abba music, much like ACROSS THE UNIVERSE was set to Beatles music. If I have to compare the two, I’d say the biggest difference is that the actors singing the songs in MAMMA MIA aren’t nearly as good of singers as the actors in ACROSS THE UNIVERSE. Seyfried and Streep do okay, but Dominic Cooper and Pierce Brosnan shouldn’t even sing in the shower. Thankfully, they limit their singing, or give them songs that don’t require much range. However, for those roles, I think they would have been better served finding singers that can act and not actors that can sing. Sometimes it’s better to surround a talented cast with actual musicians in order to handle the more difficult songs, or to add a bit of legitimacy to the film, ala CHICAGO.
But regardless of who sings, the music is the selling point. Good music in a musical will at least make it okay. What makes MAMMA MIA! good is that director Phyllida Lloyd keeps everything rolling and doesn’t waste the audience’s time. She knows why we’re there and she skips to the next song quickly and smoothly. She also does a fine job with the dance numbers, which provide pleasing visuals while you’re listening to some good songs. The routines won’t blow you away, but they work for the movie.
MAMMA MIA! is a fun film that will please anyone that’s a fan of Abba. But even if you don’t have one of their albums, or won’t admit to having one, I think you’ll catch on to the songs rather quickly. The film covers just about every decent Abba song and it does it so well that you’ll probably want to watch this one a few times.
Tags: Amanda Seyfried, Meryl Streep, Phyllida Lloyd, Pierce Brosnan Posted in Reviews |
|