Flix 66 The place for all your movie kicks
Search Results

Latest Headlines



Posts Tagged ‘Richard Dreyfuss’

Julian McMahon joins Richard Dreyfuss and Bruce Willis in Red

Friday, November 13th, 2009

Posted by: Kristy Sturdivant

Julian McMahon is in talks to co-star in RED with Richard Dreyfuss, Bruce Willis, Brian Cox, Morgan Freeman, Helen Mirren, John C. Reilly and Mary Louise Parker.  The story is based on the Wildstorm/DC Comics miniseries that follows a retired black-ops agent, played by Willis, who has to battle assassins trying to kill him.  Julian McMahon will play the VP of a company at the heart of the conspiracy.  The movie will start filming in January of 2010.

Movies based on comic series are either really good or pretty average, hopefully director Robert Schwentke will give us a good story to go with this great cast.

McMahon

Source: The Hollywood Reporter

One You Might’ve Missed #07: Let It Ride

Thursday, November 5th, 2009

headermiss3

by: Jeremey Gingrich

Finding diamonds in the rough is a wonderful feeling, but in order to do so, you usually have to watch a lot of bad movies. Flix66.com takes the pain away by recommending a movie that you may have never heard of, or missed when it first came out.

Too often, when a movie is made about horses, it speaks to their majesty as in BLACK BEAUTY or the underdog story of inspiration as in SEABISCUIT or Disney’s RACING STRIPES (though admittedly that was a zebra), but there was one movie, back in 1989, that celebrated the people that made up the truly diverse racetrack experience and that was director Joe Pytka’s LET IT RIDE, starring Richard Dreyfuss in what I believe to be his second funniest role of his career (GOODBYE GIRL won him an Oscar for a reason).

In LET IT RIDE, Dreyfuss plays Jay Trotter, a cab driver whose marriage is on the rocks – to a firecracker of a wife played by Teri Garr, who gets some great screaming matches- and in an effort to save the marriage Jay offers to give up gambling. This is a noticeable sacrifice when he goes to the track the next day – yes, the day after making the promise – believing he has a line on a sure thing, and we see he is a regular at the dive bar across the street, known for years by the motley crew of resident gamblers and even some of the lower level staff of the track itself, after years of feeding his habit betting on the horses.

This motley crew runs the gamut of track regulars, and that gamut grows as Trotter wins throughout the day and we go from the dive bar across the street, to the upper-crust Jockey Club overlooking the track. Trotter’s friend, Looney, played by David Johanson (also known as singer Buster Poindexter from the big 80’s pop hit “Hot,Hot,Hot”), is called by Trotter “the unluckiest person in the world.” He plays the lovable loser who even gives blood during the day for more track money. There’s also Robbie Coltrane sporting an American accent as a cashier at Trotter’s ticket window. Jennifer Tilly is seen here, sexy as she’s ever been, as Vicki, the trophy girl to a rich jerk at the Jockey Club. And even a pre-SEX IN THE CITY Cynthia Nixon plays an underage newbie to the track who catches the gambling bug during the course of the day.

But the strength of the movie, or in any movie where money is gambled, is the reaction to each race performed with perfect histrionics by Richard Dreyfuss. Trotter flails and screams at the horses and the track, throws beer on Looney, even screams at God, “I thought we had a deal!” It’s hard not to root for a guy who goes through such pain in every race. And when he wins, his celebratory tantrums are that much funnier. I’ve thought it since JAWS, Richard Dreyfuss has one of the funniest laughs in the movies.

LET IT RIDE celebrates the track, its highs and its lows, and the variety of people you’ll meet if you spend any random day down at the horse track, or even an Off Track Betting spot for that matter. Everybody has a system or a theory on picking a winner, and those people can go from supporting your losses, to bitterly envying your wins as quick as the opening of a starting gate. This movie shows that roller coaster while following one funny little man’s “very good day” at the track.

W.

Friday, September 18th, 2009

W is a film that will elicit a lot of opinions and thoughts before people even see it, mainly because of the topical subject matter it covers. Even now, with Obama in office and America heading in a different direction, people can’t stop talking about our 43rd President. Knowing Oliver Stone’s distaste for Mr. Bush and republicans in general, I was expecting a two hour film dedicated to insulting and humiliating our former President. After all, this is Oliver Stone; he’s not exactly known for his even handed storytelling.

Stone didn’t exactly have to do much, as all Americans know, George W. Bush can humiliate himself without the help of a filmmaker. Stone shows us some of these moments, but is careful not to paint him as a clown. Stone manages to show audiences that behind the ridiculous comments and the frat parties, George W. Bush is just as human as the rest of us. He’s not (completely) a bumbling idiot that many people may have thought he was. So I have to pause and acknowledge that maybe Oliver Stone is finally growing as a filmmaker, because here, he has managed to leave his personal agenda behind and let the events unfold naturally on the screen.

The film is told in two intertwined stories. The first story starts with Bush (Josh Brolin) in his early fraternity days, progressing towards his run for Governor and the second has him in office, leading up to the Iraq war. We’ve heard a lot of this stuff before, either through heresy or in the newspaper. Stone sticks with the major stuff (meeting Laura (Elizabeth Perkins), finding Jesus, running for Governor, etc.) but maybe delves too far into his relationship with his father, played by James Cromwell. If I question the legitimacy of any part of the movie, it would probably be their relationship. It’s easy to assume that a doofus son would struggle to live up to his father’s expectations, but I wonder how much of it was inferred and how much was based off fact.

The meat of the film centered on the meetings Bush had with his advisory team. Thandie Newton, Richard Dreyfuss, Jeffrey Wright and Scott Glenn made up Condoleeza Rize, Dick Cheney, Colin Powell and Donald Rumsfeld respectively. All of them were shockingly good in their roles, even if Newton over dramatized Rice a little too much. However, I laughed out loud several times watching her and her reactions to Bush’s comments. I don’t know if that was Newton on her own or Stone yelling at her off screen, but it was fantastic. The scene with the team towards the end of the film as they were reflecting on the lack of WMD’s in Iraq was a wonderful scene and well worth the price of admission alone.

Unfortunately, the interactions with the cabinet are sporadic and the rest of the story is a little dull. The father-son relationship overshadowed much of the film and it was dramatized to the point that it was distracting. We also had some ideas or sub-storylines that were thrown out there but never explored (his girlfriend and her reported abortion, etc.). I can assume that these were left to interpretation because Stone didn’t have the facts, but it would’ve been better to leave them out altogether.

But one of the challenges of making a bio-film about a living person is that you don’t have your ending written for you. That was evident in this film because Stone didn’t know how to end it. It felt like there was more story to tell, because there was. Heck, Bush wasn’t even out of office when the film was released in theaters, much less when they stopped production. I think waiting a year and covering Bush’s reaction to Obama taking over and a reflection on his Presidency would have been a nice way to end everything. As it was, the film just kind of ended and for the first time in my life, I was actually left wanting more George W. Bush.