movie reviews at flix66 The place for all your movie kicks
Search Results

Posts Tagged ‘romantic movies’

One You Might’ve Missed #06: The Shape Of Things

Thursday, October 29th, 2009

headermiss3

by: Nathan

Finding diamonds in the rough is a wonderful feeling, but in order to do so, you usually have to watch a lot of bad movies. Flix66.com takes the pain away by recommending a movie that you may have never heard of, or missed when it first came out.

The Shape of Things is one of the best relationship movies, and unlike any I’ve ever seen. It’s unfortunate, but it seems that many have missed out on this little gem. Without giving too much away, I will say that it is slightly darker than you might expect it to be. If that sentence appealed to you, definitely check this film out.

Shape of things 4

Evelyn is taking pictures of a statue that was deemed pornographic and has been altered to be less offensive. Adam works at the art museum and attempts to step in after Evelyn crosses the velvet rope. Adam is a little dorky and has no real authority and can only simply plead with her to at least wait to cross the velvet rope until after his shift. The two strike up a very interesting conversation and appear to be slightly fascinated with the other. Both are college students with opposing views. Adam is more practical and unsure and Evelyn is free spirited and confident. The conversation is awkward and charming at the same time. I believe the opening scene is symbolic of some of the points that writer and director Neil Labute is addressing throughout about people interacting with each other, specifically the opposite sex.

Shape of things 5

Labute originally wrote this for the stage and has re-teamed his cast for the film version. All the actors do a terrific job! Rachel Weisz and Paul Rudd play the two leads very convincingly. Gretchen Mol and Fred Weller play a couple who are best friends with Rudd’s character and can’t understand the change in him and his new relationship with Evelyn. The actors have a natural chemistry with one another. One could attribute most of the credit to the writing, which is true, but with the wrong actors the material could have been butchered. My one complaint is that they might tend to overact the parts, which would be suitable for their stage production, however for film they need to tone it down just a pinch. Rachel Weisz is the stand out of the group who gives an incredibly performance embodying her character with ease and strength.

Shape of things 3

The Shape of Things is completely character and dialogue driven consisting of only a handful of scenes that are well lit and confined in areas that won’t deter the audience from the actors. The story is a fascinating look at relationships and what we as people are willing to compromise and change for the better or worse for one’s whom we love or think we love. I love the concept of this story, which isn’t fully realized by the audience until it’s almost literally thrown in your face at the end of the movie. Every time I watch this I have a smile on my face throughout. It is void of a non-engaging moment and is done simply with dialogue. Again, I don’t want to give too much away so I urge all to see and be patient. I think it raises interesting conversation and perspective on relationships better than I have seen before. The velvet rope from the beginning represents our own morals and manners as humans even if it isn’t necessarily a law. Do we cross that line or respectfully keep at bay?

Jim Sturgess and Kirsten Dunst to star in Upside Down

Friday, October 16th, 2009

Posted by: Kristy

Jim Sturgess and Kirsten Dunst have agreed to star in the upcoming film UPSIDE DOWN.  The film will be directed by newcomer Juan Diego Solanas, who also wrote the script.

The film is a science fiction based love story involving different worlds and alternate realities.  The title is derived from the idea that the different worlds have different perceptions of what is up and what is down.  Sturgess and Dunst will play lovers that have to find a way to be together, even if their “worlds” aren’t compatible.

It’s slim pickin’s out there for good science fiction movies and I’m not sure casting Kirsten Dunst is the best way to go to break the trend, but with a visionary director, this one might be decent.

sturgess and dunst

Source: Production Weekly (via Twitter)

One You Might’ve Missed #04: Kissing Jessica Stein

Thursday, October 15th, 2009

headermiss3

by: Jeremey

Finding diamonds in the rough is a wonderful feeling, but in order to do so, you usually have to watch a lot of bad movies. Flix66.com takes the pain away by recommending a movie that you may have never heard of, or missed when it first came out.

Woody Allen wrote and starred in two great movies about relationships in New York City with ANNIE HALL and MANHATTAN. However, in the years when he was making SMALL TIME CROOKS and THE CURSE OF THE JADE SCORPION, it was easy to forget about that past greatness. Well, in that absence emerged Jennifer Westfeldt and Heather Juergensen with an adaptation from their off-Broadway play “Lipschtick.” KISSING JESSICA STEIN is about the quintessential neurotic Woody Allen character, this time as the gorgeous Westfeldt as Jessica Stein, trying to find love in New York City with a revolving door of blind dates with hilariously inept men (keep your eye out for Hollywood Squares favorite Jim J. Bullock). Heather Juergensen plays Helen Cooper, the polar opposite to Jessica, who has no problem getting men, but uses a collection of them to fill her different needs; one for sex, one for money, one for intellect, etc.

Kissing Jessica Stein 1

Jessica answers Helen’s ad in personal ad, and they hit it off, and then Jessica goes through the “Jew from Scarsdale” transformation to lesbian as if it was something you can practice; she even gets pamphlets for helpful hints. Jessica’s neuroses are hilarious to the viewer, but noticeably frustrating to Helen, who’s a little beyond that point in her life.

Kissing Jessica Stein 2

Supporting roles by Carson Elrod and Michael Mastro as the “Will and Grace”-style funny gay counsel for Helen and a great turn by Tovah Feldshuh as the stereotypical “meet a nice Jewish boy”-Jewish mother make this a good ensemble but the best reason to watch and rewatch this movie is for Jennifer Westfeldt. She’s nervous, she’s sexy, she’s smart, she’s opinionated, she’s all over the place and in a very good way. A great deleted scene of her on a boat at the Bethesda fountain reservoir with a disastrous suitor in which she goes off on a rant about life and love and fear and fortitude and shoes that takes her everywhere from vulnerable to confident to mean to heartbreaking all the way to Gary Busey-crazy.

Kissing Jessica Stein 4

Bottom line for KISSING JESSICA STEIN: If you like ANNIE HALL, you’ll like this movie. If you don’t like ANNIE HALL… check your pulse.

Kissing Jessica Stein 5

Foot Notes: KISSING JESSICA STEIN shot some of its scenes in New York without blocking off the set, so some bystanders can be seen in the shots blatantly looking right at the camera as if to say, “Hey Ma, their shootin’ one of them there movin’ pictures.” Also, they had two showings at the Toronto Film Festival; one on September 10th, 2001, and another on September 12th. They had scenes with the World Trade Center in them which drew noticeable reactions from the crowd on the second viewing. They were later cut.

He Said/She Said #03: Sex and the City

Monday, October 12th, 2009

headerhsss1

by: Sturdy and Kristy

He Said/She Said is a bi-weekly column where a male and female reviewer from the site team up to debate the merits of a particular film.

He Said:

I hate to admit this, but I actually kind of enjoyed the TV show, at least the first few seasons.  It was fun watching four middle-aged women searching for love in NYC and tackling all of the obstacles and surprises the city can throw at them.  But as the show dragged on and grew in popularity, I think everyone lost sight of what they had.  And when the movie came out…well…it was too little, too late.

sex and the city 2

My biggest problem is that these “middle-aged” women are no longer middle-aged.  They’re pushing 50 or more and what’s worse; they look it.  These women should no longer be hooking up with young models in nightclubs; they should be knitting their grandkids oversized sweaters.  So there’s a reality check with the film that we didn’t have with the earlier seasons of the show and that has adversely affected the story they’re trying to tell.

But even if they had 20 year-old actresses in these roles, the film wouldn’t have worked.  It’s basically four episodes sloppily edited together.  In fact, at every 27 minute mark, you could splice in the theme song and credits and you wouldn’t even realize you’re watching a movie.  It’s so choppy and poorly written that it’s almost like the filmmakers are telling you they don’t have enough material and they’re okay with it.

sex and the city 4

Maybe I’m just not in touch enough with my 50 year-old feminine side to appreciate the film, but I found this to be very difficult to watch.  And I’m still trying to figure out what Jennifer Hudson was doing there.

She Said:

I found the movie to be a nice wrap up to a good series and I enjoyed it.  The characters became like good friends who I wanted to share more experiences with.  There are lots of TV shows that I loved and would be happy to see made into a feature length film, and I thought Sex and the City did a good job with that transition.

sex and the city 3

This movie is about friendship and growing as a human being, age is irrelevant.  I believe the film completed the cycle the series started, as in, we saw the characters come full circle with their relationships.  All four characters found what they were looking for in a way they didn’t expect—just like real life (hopefully).  I find it refreshing that society is starting to see that women can live lives without men past their thirties and realizing that we don’t need to pack it in at 50 and start dying off.  Sex and the City made being single and successful something to admire and respect instead of something to pity and be ashamed of.

As far as the film being episodic—I can see where that would be a problem for some, but I think they were able to pull it off alright.  I’d imagine it’s tough for a television writer to take a show and make it into a film and I don’t think it would have been any different with any other sitcom.  Do you think if they made Seinfeld into a movie it would be smooth sailing?

sex and the city 5

As for Jennifer Hudson, I think she was just a plot point for Carrie to not lose sight of love.  I think she was necessary as a plot device but could have been played by any number of actresses.

I’m glad Hollywood listened and made the movie and I hope they continue to listen to their female audience.  Yes, women love romantic comedies but our interests are not only on the male gender and how we want to find Mr. Right.  Women love a good friendship story, which is why Sex and the City was and is still so popular—I know a lot of women would love to have a tight knit group of friends like Carrie, Miranda, Charlotte and Samantha.  Heck, I’d love it myself and I look forward to seeing them in their next film.